Spyware Warrior Spyware Warrior
Help with Spyware, Hijacking & Other Internet Nuisances
 
FAQ :: Search :: Memberlist :: Usergroups :: Register
Profile :: Log in to check your private messages :: Log in

Problems with new adaware version

 
Post new topic   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    Spyware Warrior Forum Index -> Anti-Spyware and Security Software Discussion
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
JackofShadows
Junior Member


Joined: 03 Sep 2004
Last Visit: 26 Sep 2005
Posts: 17

PostPosted: Sat Sep 04, 2004 12:21 am    Post subject: Problems with new adaware version Reply with quote

Hey all,

Since I upgraded to the new adaware version, Hotbor doesn't seem to be identified and removed.
Now, I've heard rumers that HB were threatening to persecute lavasoft if they don't take 'em off their list. Could this be true?!

When conducting a TAC search on www.lavasoft.de website I also noticed that hotbar is not identifed.

I'm currently using adaware SE, updated yesterday.

Could anyone check on thier computer to see if they really have pulled hotbar out of their threat list ?

If this is true I'm switching to other alternatievs. If not, hotbar has really messed up my computer.

In the meanwhile I'm getting all sorts of porno ads... Evil or Very Mad

Thanks,
J
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mikey
Malware Expert


Joined: 12 Feb 2004
Last Visit: 19 Jun 2013
Posts: 1067
Location: CenTex

PostPosted: Sat Sep 04, 2004 6:00 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

You're right, I wonder why that is. Hotbar is both adware and spyware.

SSD targets it. I just checked to see if Hotbar had been updated. SSD leaves behind the folder ?:\Program Files\Hotbar\bin\4.5.1.0 but it is easily removed. SSD did successfully kill it tho. Smile
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
JackofShadows
Junior Member


Joined: 03 Sep 2004
Last Visit: 26 Sep 2005
Posts: 17

PostPosted: Sat Sep 04, 2004 7:06 am    Post subject: Hotbar Reply with quote

I thought so.

Can anyone contact lavasoft and see why this is happeninig ? They gave no worning.

I tried mailing them but got an answer that they only treat messages from licensed products.

If the most popular detector is giving up we're all in big trouble...

J.

P.s. sorry for the double messaging, I clicked new topic by accident.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mikey
Malware Expert


Joined: 12 Feb 2004
Last Visit: 19 Jun 2013
Posts: 1067
Location: CenTex

PostPosted: Sat Sep 04, 2004 2:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I saw your posts at LS.

Hotbar's backdoor(always on auto updater) still connects at regular intervals. In addition to ads and any wares it loads, transfers also include historical data to profile users. This is confirmed as of todays testing.

http://www.kephyr.com/spywarescanner/library/hotbar/index.phtml

http://www.howard.edu/technology/hotbar/

http://www.pestpatrol.com/pestinfo/h/hotbar.asp#Risks

http://www.doxdesk.com/parasite/HotBar.html

http://www.pchell.com/support/hotbar.shtml

http://sarc.com/avcenter/venc/data/adware.hotbar.html
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
webhelper
SWW Expert


Joined: 11 Apr 2004
Last Visit: 16 Jul 2011
Posts: 1090

PostPosted: Sat Sep 04, 2004 6:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I have created a special page about hotbar on my site.

http://www.webhelper4u.com/screenshots/hotbar.htm

Hotbar is using mutliple box's that makes users aware that they are installing their adware. They clearly have their EULA and in their FAQ, even have their own uninstaller.

To have them detected they would have to pass one of the TAC's of which they do not right now. About the only way right now without them having legal recource is to show where they are installed as 3rd party bundled software without users knowing it was installed with no EULA to agree to before hand. As of right now the only way I have found is either directly installing from their site or a user would have to click on one of the popup ads which directs them to the hotbar.com site and go thru the same install as is in my screen shots.
_________________
Wächter der Geschichten:
http://www.webhelper4u.com/thewatcher.html
Member of ASAP Since 2004
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
JackofShadows
Junior Member


Joined: 03 Sep 2004
Last Visit: 26 Sep 2005
Posts: 17

PostPosted: Sat Sep 04, 2004 10:00 pm    Post subject: hotbar not identified Reply with quote

Hey,

I'm quating my reply from LS board. I think it is safe to say that Hotbar is a spyware and a very bad one.

"Here's how Hotbar fits the TAC:

1. Opens web sites not initiated by the user/unsolicited popups and/or requests to join a different site - Known problem.

2. Provides no uninstaller at all or non-functional application uninstaller - I had to remove 5 different applications - hotbar tools/email tools/ weather/ comparative shoping and one wowpapers. I wonder how many people know that hotbar is installing 5 different programs all of which spring pops.
If hotbar web tools is removed you have the feeling the application is no longer on your computer - however pops continue. VERY BAD !

3. Connects to a remote system without the user's awareness to transmit/receive information- Just use a simple firewall and see how many times this system connects to the servers without prior notification.

4.Auto-updates without user permission and/or knowledge.

5. Operates in stealth (Runs hidden from the user) - after you remove hotbar web tools.

Quite a list isn't it ?
I'm sure it answers to som of the other categories as well.

So... would you say it wualifies as a spyware ?


The thing is, that hotbar was once detectde by adaware. I'm curious why it was pulled out.

J.
"
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mikey
Malware Expert


Joined: 12 Feb 2004
Last Visit: 19 Jun 2013
Posts: 1067
Location: CenTex

PostPosted: Sun Sep 05, 2004 2:22 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hey WH, thx for the heads up on the reasoning.

However I must agree with Jack about the fact that Hotbar's uninstall string does not remove anywhere near everything deposited.

It is spyware/adware and I for one don't think a flashed click thru EULA warrants a vote of legitimacy from the pri/sec community.

Kids and other users sometimes DL without paying attention. When I run a scan on my kid's box, I want to know that the garbage will be found.

Personally, I think the LS decision to remove Hotbar from targeting is a mistake. I want the spies in my sys dealt with whether I, a client, or my family clicked a EULA or not.

BTW As I recall, the name AdAware was chosen because the tool was supposed to make users aware that adware/spyware exists on their machine. If Hotbar isn't targeted, then the user is not made Ad....Aware.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
webhelper
SWW Expert


Joined: 11 Apr 2004
Last Visit: 16 Jul 2011
Posts: 1090

PostPosted: Sun Sep 05, 2004 6:26 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

You need to read the my link with the screen shots. last night I clicked on their ad and it will roduce the same 3 screens you must click on to get an install.

JackofShadows..how did you get the hotbar installed? We need hard evidence such as fire wall log files to show that at some site and install takes place with out going thru their 3 screens "Next, Open, then accept" to get an install.

As long as they have all that along with a EULA and how to uninstall they would be labled as adware.

I don't disagree with the adware part but in order to we would need to document a case showing how it installs as a 3rd party or stealth without any signs of an EULA or how to uninstall it..

You must remember that I am also one of the mods at Lavasoft as well as one who researches and tests this type of stuff. That is like posting about security software not being any good at this board of which we take flake from their creators and so we gather all the hard evidence to prof\ve otherwise.

If you can show hard evidence that users will get the hotbar installed without any warning, no eula shown and no way to uninstall other than with 3rd party or manual methods..present them to Lavasoft along with the link to where it happened so they can go and duplicate the issue and if found to be not meeting any of the TAC, then it would probably be readded to the detection.
_________________
Wächter der Geschichten:
http://www.webhelper4u.com/thewatcher.html
Member of ASAP Since 2004
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
JackofShadows
Junior Member


Joined: 03 Sep 2004
Last Visit: 26 Sep 2005
Posts: 17

PostPosted: Sun Sep 05, 2004 6:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Dear webhelper,

Let me start by expressing my honest appriciation to you and your work.

Concerning your request on installation procedure info, I must admit that it's my child who downloaded the application. He saw and email icon he liked and pressed on it. From there he probably got to hotbar's site and downloaded it through their procedure.

Still, there are 2 points to keep in mind:

A) At download.com, adaware presenst itself as "Scan your system for ad-supported software components and remove them.".
This is what keeps it the no.1 download today. From what you are saying the fact that this is an adsupported application doesn't qualify it as being detected by adaware Confused
If this is so, the honest thing to do is make this fact public.

B) What about old hotbar users. Those who got the application before hotbar changed its policy, without their consent. Aren't they entitled for a honest search ?
Is it fair to allow a company to capture helpless users and then keep them within it's evil web by "converting"?


To sum things, what we have here is a program that springs HUGE amounts of popups, connects to the servers and upgrades without notifying the user.
Difficult as hell to remove (5 different applications hidden well within the add remove list).
Adding self promoting links to user's emails.

And Lavasoft doesn't categorize it as adware that should be detected and removed ?
I'm sure everyone here will agree that it sounds bad and concerning.

Best,
J.

P.s. If lavasoft is so concerned about law suits, the first thing to do is change the description at download.com. It's completely misleading.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mikey
Malware Expert


Joined: 12 Feb 2004
Last Visit: 19 Jun 2013
Posts: 1067
Location: CenTex

PostPosted: Sun Sep 05, 2004 8:28 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ref; http://www.lavasoftsupport.com/index.php?s=ee26439ac774d9a9d10d8fb9c7957e9c&showtopic=44037

Quote:
After webhelpers extensive research on this it is apparant that HotBar still passes the TAC.
This research can be viewed here.
It will not be added to the detections at this time.
Please everyone, read the EULA's of all programs before installing them.
If you do not fully understand them, you could either do the neccessary research, or simply decline the istallation and search for another similar program.

Thanks...

Jerry Skinner
Lavasoft Technical Support Forum Administrator




So is LS going to stop targeting ALL the nasties who present a EULA that no one reads?

That should cut out about 75% of the current targets.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
MadameX
Site Admin


Joined: 12 Jul 2004
Last Visit: 27 Apr 2008
Posts: 1438

PostPosted: Sun Sep 05, 2004 9:41 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Shocked

This situation is getting more and more disturbing each day!

Deb
_________________
CARMA
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
herbalist
Warrior Addict


Joined: 28 Aug 2004
Last Visit: 25 Jun 2008
Posts: 726
Location: northern Michigan

PostPosted: Sun Sep 05, 2004 12:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

mikey wrote:
So is LS going to stop targeting ALL the nasties who present a EULA that no one reads?

That should cut out about 75% of the current targets.


As long as HotBar stays on the "legal side" of the line, there is little that AAW can do. Like most here, I find those EULAs very much a pain to read thru but unfortunately, that's all that they need to do to be legal, no matter what we think of how they do things. If they're like most, one of their next versions will cross the line again and be re-classified again. Sure, they could be targeted, but all that's going to do is get AAW and others sued and put out of business. Then where would we be? This battle is changing in regard to tactics. These people are using the law as a weapon now while making sure that they just barely qualify as legal. You can bet that their money has influence on just how these laws are written, and therein lies the problem. If you're going to attack "money" you'd better be right and be able to prove it. Even then, they will do everything possible to drain you til you can't fight anymore.
What would help here would be a separate list of items that would include items like HotBar that don't meet the legal definition. It could be called "user requested removals" or something similar. Some kind of category change that would allow it to be listed without being labelled as adware.
HotBar basically dropped this in our laps by "going legal", making us take responsibility for our own actions. On units I've worked on, I've locked out IE6 and installed Mozilla, stopping most of the undesired installs. The hosts file can also help a lot with this, denying access to many of those sites. Good firewall rules can help a lot here too.
As far as kids are concerned, that's a problem of its own. The computer is no longer the safe toy it once was. A kids usage has to be controlled. The computer can't be used as a babysitter like a TV once was. I'm not saying that you're doing this, but I know quite a few who do, so I'm not pointing at you. We don't let kids drive the car whenever they want. We can't let them play on the web whenever or wherever they want. Not without some very serious control measures.
Rick
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
mikey
Malware Expert


Joined: 12 Feb 2004
Last Visit: 19 Jun 2013
Posts: 1067
Location: CenTex

PostPosted: Sun Sep 05, 2004 12:25 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

How exactly is Hotbar legit?

Let's see; It's a spyware. It's an adware. It's an uncontroled backdoor. Nope, I don't see any legitimacy here.

As mentioned, a large majority of the current targets do in fact have EULAs that also spell out the facts if someone actually looked. Many of those are not nearly as invasive as Hotbar.

Would I understand right, that LS is buckling under pressure of legal action...even tho they are aware of public reaction for or against them? I'm sure the community would be a pretty large voice in Lavasoft's defense but I believe the folks might be a little concerned to find out LS has no fight.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
MadameX
Site Admin


Joined: 12 Jul 2004
Last Visit: 27 Apr 2008
Posts: 1438

PostPosted: Sun Sep 05, 2004 1:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

herbalist wrote:
What would help here would be a separate list of items that would include items like HotBar that don't meet the legal definition. It could be called "user requested removals" or something similar. Some kind of category change that would allow it to be listed without being labelled as adware.


That is a very good idea. Wonder if it would fly?
Quote:
HotBar basically dropped this in our laps by "going legal", making us take responsibility for our own actions.


Hotbar: "If you don't take the time to read and understand our 10 million word legalese, that is your problem, not ours!"

Quote:
As far as kids are concerned, that's a problem of its own. The computer is no longer the safe toy it once was. A kids usage has to be controlled. The computer can't be used as a babysitter like a TV once was. I'm not saying that you're doing this, but I know quite a few who do, so I'm not pointing at you. We don't let kids drive the car whenever they want. We can't let them play on the web whenever or wherever they want. Not without some very serious control measures.
Rick


This is such a gray area (kids) it's scary!

I am so very disappointed about this. Crying or Very sad

Deb
_________________
CARMA
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
herbalist
Warrior Addict


Joined: 28 Aug 2004
Last Visit: 25 Jun 2008
Posts: 726
Location: northern Michigan

PostPosted: Sun Sep 05, 2004 2:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Mikey wrote:
Would I understand right, that LS is buckling under pressure of legal action...even tho they are aware of public reaction for or against them? I'm sure the community would be a pretty large voice in Lavasoft's defense but I believe the folks might be a little concerned to find out LS has no fight.

I'm not sure what exactly is/has been happening at Lavasoft. A lot of changes in a very short time, some of which don't make a lot of sense.
I used to work the windows general forum over there. It, along with the members forums were all closed with no warning. Their closing the Lavalounge made sense, a lot of wasted bandwidth, but the windows general section was one place that new users could get help with preventing many of the problems in the first place, plus help with almost anything else. Closing that benefits no one. Their letting go Aaron about the same time the new version came out is what really concerns me. I sent out several e-mails and PMs there asking about much of this. Only 2 Pms were answered, and they didn't answer the main questions. I can only speculate as to what or who has the controlling influence there now.
MadameX wrote:
That is a very good idea. Wonder if it would fly?

Legally, it should be quite do-able. Whether they'd be willing to do it, I'm not betting on it. Not anymore. I was initially disappointed with the new version of SpyBot S&D. Might have to give it another look. I think we're going to find ourselves more and more on our own when it comes to a lot of this.

As for the kids, there are several user control methods that can be taken, assuming we can make the computers owner understand why it's necessary. On one unit, I used the firewall to lock out IE6, then installed Mozilla in a container file, effectively locking their kids out of the internet. Gave up on the idea of educating kids about what can happen on the internet. They don't want to hear it. All they want is free music, new games, and porn. I put a few of those ideas in my website for 98 and ME users.
Rick
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
Crusader
Junior Member


Joined: 12 Aug 2004
Last Visit: 15 Apr 2007
Posts: 15

PostPosted: Sun Sep 05, 2004 6:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

O.K., so "they" can't call it adware, why not call it pornware or something?? From my understanding it delivers porn related pop-ups.

Personally I see the whole internet going downhill very fast, to just present a EULA gives them immunity?? That is b.s. . If that is all it takes then I am pretty sure there is going to alot more crapware writers that are going to go "legal", personally I put ad-aware with all the other shareware products out there, they seem to be in it just for the $$ now, which there is nothing wrong with that, just they are heavily burdened with legalities.

The whole internet community is gettin hurt because all of this legal crap, what happened to that "26 page" spyware bill that was in congress?? I am so sick and tired of all these technical legalaties protecting these scumwriters, we should be hounding our governments and not lavasoft.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Sergei
Newbie


Joined: 05 Sep 2004
Last Visit: 20 Sep 2004
Posts: 2

PostPosted: Sun Sep 05, 2004 6:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

What's worrying about the new Spybot version? Does it too detect less than it did before?

Are both the major anti-spyware apps being "assimilated"?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
connie cavan
Newbie


Joined: 16 Aug 2004
Last Visit: 30 Nov 2004
Posts: 2
Location: san francisco area

PostPosted: Sun Sep 05, 2004 6:38 pm    Post subject: Spykiller "Free Trial" Reply with quote

While I was on the site today reading about freeware I downloaded Spykiller for a "free trial run"/ It showed I had a couple of minor problems, but wanted $29.95 to fix them.

When I opted out I found that Spykiller has imbedded itself and I can't get rid of it. Do I have options here? This seems oh so illegal. Twisted Evil Connie
_________________
connie75
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
herbalist
Warrior Addict


Joined: 28 Aug 2004
Last Visit: 25 Jun 2008
Posts: 726
Location: northern Michigan

PostPosted: Sun Sep 05, 2004 8:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

My original gripe regarding SpyBot was false detections, including a link to my own website. That and adding another running process I didn't want. Never was impressed by the lack of regular updating.

Unfortunately, the internet is a far different place than it was intended. Just going out and "surfing the web" has become about the equivalent of playing in traffic, uncontrolled traffic at that. The time is coming that this whole system will have to be overhauled and get set up completely different, complete with its equivalent of "traffic laws". I just hope Microslop doesn't get to decide how it will be done.
Rick
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
Scaramouche
Malware Expert


Joined: 06 Jul 2004
Last Visit: 03 May 2006
Posts: 141
Location: Manila, Philippines

PostPosted: Mon Sep 06, 2004 12:47 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'd have to agree that Ad-Aware (and by extension, all anti-spyware vendors) are in kind of a sticky wicket here. The problem lay in that the EULA is on it's face, binding, regardless of its length or legalese. Obviously you can go too far with a EULA (witness the guy who won't let you post screenshots or criticism) but unfortunately in this case they do represent their software's workings relatively accurately. Having no uninstaller is unprofessional, but is it illegal?

That said, Ad-Aware and others could perhaps turn the tables by describing the product in question in more neutral terms. Is hotbar objecting to the fact that Ad-Aware can remove their product, or to the fact that their software is classified as undesirable?
_________________
---
My comments represent my own opinions and research.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
mikey
Malware Expert


Joined: 12 Feb 2004
Last Visit: 19 Jun 2013
Posts: 1067
Location: CenTex

PostPosted: Mon Sep 06, 2004 4:02 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I don't think it is a matter of legality.

Folks want these critters removed. Bot killers provide this service. As far as I know, there is no legal reason not to provide targeting of this. Hotbar clearly fits into PMK's criteria in several ways; http://www.safer-networking.org/en/targetpolicy/index.html Just because it has a EULA, does that preclude targeting?...not any way I can see.

The bot killers are responsible only to their users...not the spies.

There is ofcourse the legal question of slander. Truth tho is not slander.

Even tho I have heard no scuttlebutt, I wanted to be sure that there was no campaign by Hotbar to influence PMK...so I asked;
http://forums.net-integration.net/index.php?showtopic=22143

There has to be more to this than what meets the eye. I ask again, does LS intend to stop targeting ALL the nasties that have EULAs?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
connie cavan
Newbie


Joined: 16 Aug 2004
Last Visit: 30 Nov 2004
Posts: 2
Location: san francisco area

PostPosted: Mon Sep 06, 2004 8:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Th herbalist: Thanks for the tip on Godzilla, and if that was your insert on Windows 98. much gracio. very informative. Now I know why my old faithful 98 finally gave up and crashed, even with no bugs. A bow to Internet Explorer. Would still like to know how to get unwanted so-called spyware out of my system, as the regular methold won't work. I now have a Dell, but still have Windows.
_________________
connie75
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
herbalist
Warrior Addict


Joined: 28 Aug 2004
Last Visit: 25 Jun 2008
Posts: 726
Location: northern Michigan

PostPosted: Mon Sep 06, 2004 9:07 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks. The site is mine, although a long way from finished. Just haven't had the time.
I think the key here to avoiding legal complications lies in how they're classified. Terms like malware, pornware, undesirable, etc, need to be avoided. That'll just bring slander suits and the like. If put under a term like "user requested", that will get the adware companies off the hook. The scumware writers normal argument is that their software doesn't deserve the label it gets, playing with technicalities is what it boils down to. "User requested" would be much harder to argue with. The biggest problem here might be needing to rewrite the ad removal programs, again, so that "user requested" items are displayed separately from "legitimate malware".
What a pain.
Rick
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
Scaramouche
Malware Expert


Joined: 06 Jul 2004
Last Visit: 03 May 2006
Posts: 141
Location: Manila, Philippines

PostPosted: Mon Sep 06, 2004 6:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

herbalist wrote:

I think the key here to avoiding legal complications lies in how they're classified. Terms like malware, pornware, undesirable, etc, need to be avoided. That'll just bring slander suits and the like. If put under a term like "user requested", that will get the adware companies off the hook. The scumware writers normal argument is that their software doesn't deserve the label it gets, playing with technicalities is what it boils down to. "User requested" would be much harder to argue with. The biggest problem here might be needing to rewrite the ad removal programs, again, so that "user requested" items are displayed separately from "legitimate malware".


I think that's what may happen. Either the behaviour itself (backdoors, transmitting user information) needs to be regulated more tightly so that even a EULA can't make it legal, or removal vendors have to be very careful about how they describe the products they remove.

If I made a program to remove Microsoft Office I'd probably be in trouble, regardless of how I described it. Add to that the fact that a lot of removal/detection tactics are 'reverse-engineered' and we could all be in trouble. If spyware gains any kind of legal validity then it might be protected from both removal and reverse-engineering like commercial software theoretically is now.

A user requested category might work in the short term, especially if the programs in question don't have any uninstallation protocol of their own but I think this problem will get a lot messier before it's resolved. The ultimate solution I think is to make the laws better, enforceable, and to engender some sort of political will to make sure they stick. This won't rule out the malefactors in Lebanon, Russia, et al, but it might cut down on the Walter Rines' of the world. The current danger is more that so called 'legitimate' businessmen will use the courts against anti-spyware vendors I think.
_________________
---
My comments represent my own opinions and research.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Yahoo Messenger
Mind control 01
Warrior


Joined: 11 Sep 2004
Last Visit: 03 Feb 2009
Posts: 156

PostPosted: Sat Sep 11, 2004 8:33 am    Post subject: Just wondered Reply with quote

Hello all, Im very new to all this but is there a program that puts false info in my computer so when the spy grabs info it has loads of rubbish to sort though?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
herbalist
Warrior Addict


Joined: 28 Aug 2004
Last Visit: 25 Jun 2008
Posts: 726
Location: northern Michigan

PostPosted: Sat Sep 11, 2004 10:27 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

That would be very difficult to do. The problem is that you'd have to know what each one wants, and they're all different. It's do-able if you know exactly what pest you're going to be dealing with and exactly what they're trying to get. Keyloggers for example will store their data in a specific file, each one calling the file something different. Unfortunately more of these products add their files to your system than the other way around. If you can be certain that a given pest is always after certain files, you might make that work. If you're going to do something like that, might as well send them something good, like a mass mailing worm or a copy of Dariks Boot and Nuke, modified to self execute.
Rick
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
Mind control 01
Warrior


Joined: 11 Sep 2004
Last Visit: 03 Feb 2009
Posts: 156

PostPosted: Sat Sep 11, 2004 12:11 pm    Post subject: Can i pick your brains Reply with quote

Hello herbalist, Thanks for your comments,Im on a learning thing at the minute while i have spare time,Ok Here go's, what about your memory and file space if say i had a disc that i ran before entering the internet that filled up all disc & file space available with all sorts of info & tricks Twisted Evil (I suppose loads of pictures & music to take up disc space),So now im full,Browser full of sites,Full of crazydownloaded files, They cant down load on me as im full,If they take info its bogus,when i finish for the night i hit restore,Sorry if this is a simplistic view but i dont want to rely on removal tools,I feel the spys are trying to play with me & when it comes to games I like to play Laughing
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
herbalist
Warrior Addict


Joined: 28 Aug 2004
Last Visit: 25 Jun 2008
Posts: 726
Location: northern Michigan

PostPosted: Sat Sep 11, 2004 4:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

If I'm reading your post right, you're talikg about completely filling up your computer so that there's no room left for "them" to install anything? Problem here is that you'll never get that far. Your computer has to have some free space just to work. When a system approaches completely full, it gets slower and more erratic. Even if you do actually manage to fill a system, you just made it useless. It can't open a web page. There's no room for it. It can't create a document, again, no room. If you're talking about a newer machine, say with a 60gb hard drive, you'd be amazed just what it's going to take to fill it. Not taking the operating system and installed programs into account, you could be talking about 800 to 1000 albums of music or hundreds of thousands of documents. The figure here is a bit high for a 60gb hard drive as I didn't deduct what's already installed, but it gives you the idea. Ideally, you're looking for a balance between security and functionality.
The best approach to keeping a system clean is a multi-step process:
1, Keep the OS up to date: security patches, critical updates, etc.

2, Use a good Anti-Virus. Quite a few are available, including some excellent free ones. Integrate it into everything that downloads or transfers files. Scan everything that comes in before you open it, no matter where it came from.

3, Get a firewall and take the time to learn how to configure it right. Again, there's plenty of good ones, some free. There's also some seriously over-rated junk. Good ones include Kerio, Sygate, and Zone Alarm in the free category. Unlike they portray it the movies, one firewall, properly configured, is plenty.

4, I realize you don't like this idea, but an anti-adware and malware program is basically a necessity. The 2 best are Ad-aware and SpyBot S&D, both free or offering free versions. There's a lot of garbage disguised as such too. Stick with these 2, either one or both. Too many pests don't qualify as a virus, worm or trojan. They get past your Anti-virus and plug your system up, drive you nuts closing popups or worse.

5, Configure your browser to be as secure as possible. There are plenty of things you can do to help here and quite a few tools to make it easier. There are also other browsers that are very good, Mozilla and Firefox being 2 of the best. Check out the "Firefox or Internet Explorer" discussion in the"General Software Discussion" section. If you decide to use Internet Explorer, get a popup blocker. Overwhelming you with popups is one way sites do undesirable installing on you. Mozilla has one built in. More info on Mozilla and Firefox at http://www.mozilla.org/

6,
Most Importantly, be aware of what can happen. Read sections like the "Virus News and Alerts" section. Use common sense regarding where you browse and what you click on. That's the most common way to get adware and Malware. Don't open e-mail you don't recognise. Be especially careful with e-mail attachments. The majority of viruses spread that way. Check out WebHelpers site, http://www.webhelper4u.com/index.html . Lokk thru the sites he lists and what they do. This will give you a much better idea of what's really out there. HPGuru has a list set up as a hosts file, free for the using. It's at http://webpages.charter.net/hpguru/hosts/hosts.html
Even if you don't use it, it'll give you an idea of just how many of these sites there are. If you have kids using the computer, I highly suggest you get it. If you want more examples of how bad it gets, look at the "spyware removal" and "hijack this sections". A different forum I work at gets a new "how do I get rid of ..." topic every couple minutes. Last I read, 80% of all personal computers are infected by something, be it adware. malware, spyware, virus, worms, trojans, keyloggers, etc. By far, prevention is the way to go.
Check out the "Making Windows 98 Better" link at the bottom of this post. While I'm writing that for win98 and ME users, much of it applies to any operating system. Everything listed there is free.
Rick
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger MSN Messenger
Moore
Moderator


Joined: 31 May 2004
Last Visit: 05 Jan 2011
Posts: 758
Location: °°.MooreLand.°°

PostPosted: Sun Sep 12, 2004 4:34 am    Post subject: Re: Can i pick your brains Reply with quote

Mind control 01 wrote:
i dont want to rely on removal tools


Gettting a bit off topic here guys , but I agree with that , its much better to be prepared to stop them before they get in , leaves less to clean up afterwards Cool

There are a few things you can use like freeware program called System Safety Monitor to help prevent hidden installations and any unwanted processes running in the background without your knowledge.

It works like an internal application firewall and it has stopped many trojans and spyware that have gotten past my firewall.
http://www.snapfiles.com/get/systemsafety.html

You can also use Regrun Security Suite to completely block all new installations using the Blacklist / "Block All" feature :
http://www.spywarewarrior.com/viewtopic.php?t=5494

Theres a whole bunch of good stuff here :
http://www.spywarewarrior.com/viewtopic.php?t=2961
_________________
| Stop Malvertising | Outpost | Blocklist Pro | Hosts |
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Mind control 01
Warrior


Joined: 11 Sep 2004
Last Visit: 03 Feb 2009
Posts: 156

PostPosted: Sun Sep 12, 2004 5:57 am    Post subject: Pick,pick, Reply with quote

Hello all Very Happy , Thanks for all your advice Wink ,I have win xp IE with sp2,I have panda,which i must say stops all spam i've not had one yet,When i first put on spybot it said i had about 30 spys & 1 trojan(I stupidly put in ebay toolbar Embarassed wow loads of spys on that)The reason i thought you could get back at the spys Guy with axe i recently met a man who who writes programs for bussiness he said tell him want i want to do & he could do it prayer ,I was going to set him a challenge just for fun,Im good at idea's once i suss whats what,Ive not long finished a book on encription boy did that make my head spin Confused Im quite new to computers but i learn fast,Im already bored surfing etc & while i have spare time i thought i'd put my brain to use on some problems just to see if i can,Please excuse my simplistic views so far im sure that will soon change,I've learnt loads from this site thank you Spyware warrior Applause ,I'll be back soon.

Last edited by Mind control 01 on Sun Sep 12, 2004 6:39 am; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
mikey
Malware Expert


Joined: 12 Feb 2004
Last Visit: 19 Jun 2013
Posts: 1067
Location: CenTex

PostPosted: Sun Sep 12, 2004 6:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

MC01, I'm sure you meant no disrespect but it is very rude to start a new topic in a totally unrelated thread. Please maintain the topic. When posting new topics, please start a new thread instead of interrupting a discussion in progress. It's called netiquette.

Could a mod please break off the OT into a new thread? Thx
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Mind control 01
Warrior


Joined: 11 Sep 2004
Last Visit: 03 Feb 2009
Posts: 156

PostPosted: Sun Sep 12, 2004 7:24 am    Post subject: Very sorry Reply with quote

Hello all,I am sorry Embarassed


P.s I do have a few more questions
I'll wait till this thread is moved .
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
JackofShadows
Junior Member


Joined: 03 Sep 2004
Last Visit: 26 Sep 2005
Posts: 17

PostPosted: Mon Sep 13, 2004 2:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hi,

After being "politely" asked not to post any more messages on the Hotbar subject on Lavasoft's forum I wanted to bring SW's community, Spybot's comments to Hotbar (After reading the below, I wonder which detector you would recommend your friends to download)


My original message:

Lavasoft, no longer detects Hotbar as spyware and stopped removing
it.

Will u also be falling into this trap ?

Jack

Spybot's reply:

Hello Jack,

According to the HotBar website, Hotbar is an add-on that
instantaneously converts your email and browser applications into
powerfully personalized instruments of enhanced functionality and visual
appeal. The Hotbar Browser Toolbar presents buttons on your Internet
Explorer browser that change while you surf to relate to the website you
visit. These buttons also provide you instant access to Search, Yellow
Pages and more! The Browser toolbar also spices up your Internet
Explorer with your chosen image (skin) picked from a huge variety of
skins numbering into the thousands found in hundreds of galleries at
www.hotbar.com.

The Hotbar Email Toolbar is added to your mail (Outlook , Outlook
Express, Hotmail and Yahoo mail) . This bar offers a wide assortment of
options for customizing the design of your emails with Backgrounds,
eCards, Animation and even a Business Card of your own design.
However, HotBar does track web site visits and also has an autoupdate feature that updates automatically. So there are both privacy and security concerns with this add-on program.
Best regards,
Norma
Team Spybot
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
JackofShadows
Junior Member


Joined: 03 Sep 2004
Last Visit: 26 Sep 2005
Posts: 17

PostPosted: Mon Sep 13, 2004 2:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I just hope I won't get banned from this forum, simply for revealing facts.
(and such popular ones)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
3162
Honorary Site Admin


Joined: 31 Mar 2004
Last Visit: 04 May 2009
Posts: 4452

PostPosted: Mon Sep 13, 2004 2:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
The Hotbar Browser Toolbar presents buttons on your Internet Explorer browser that change while you surf to relate to the website you
visit.


I know that would annoy me beyond belief. Not to mention that stealing my bandwidth in an attempt to direct me to what may well be sites from which they derive income, I suffer from Migraines which can be triggered by flashing objects.
Furthermore, were I to use Internet Explorer at all, it is MY Internet Explorer and not theirs.

Nonetheless, if a user doesn't read the lengthy EULA and blithely agrees to the installation, the legality of the product and express liabilities would be moot.
_________________
Proud member of the Chest Zipper Club!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
suzi
Site Admin


Joined: 27 Jul 2003
Last Visit: 19 Jun 2013
Posts: 10277
Location: sunny California

PostPosted: Mon Sep 13, 2004 4:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

What do you guys say if we just lock this thread and start over?

There's about 3 topics here including one completely OT about SpyKiller. I'm having a hard time figuring out which reply goes to which question without spending way too much time. Confused

If anyone wants to point out to me which posts belong together, aside from the posts about Ad-aware and Lavasoft, please reply and then I can split them.
_________________
Former Microsoft MVP 2005-2009, Consumer Security
Please do not PM or Email me for personal support. Post in the Forums instead and we will all learn. Smile
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
suzi
Site Admin


Joined: 27 Jul 2003
Last Visit: 19 Jun 2013
Posts: 10277
Location: sunny California

PostPosted: Mon Sep 13, 2004 4:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
I just hope I won't get banned from this forum, simply for revealing facts.


The only reason anyone gets banned from this forum is if they violate any of the terms of use stated in this section:

http://www.spywarewarrior.com/viewforum.php?f=4
_________________
Former Microsoft MVP 2005-2009, Consumer Security
Please do not PM or Email me for personal support. Post in the Forums instead and we will all learn. Smile
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
3162
Honorary Site Admin


Joined: 31 Mar 2004
Last Visit: 04 May 2009
Posts: 4452

PostPosted: Mon Sep 13, 2004 5:52 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I say lock it and start anew.
It's spun its wad Wink
_________________
Proud member of the Chest Zipper Club!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
suzi
Site Admin


Joined: 27 Jul 2003
Last Visit: 19 Jun 2013
Posts: 10277
Location: sunny California

PostPosted: Mon Sep 13, 2004 7:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm with you! Locked it shall be.
_________________
Former Microsoft MVP 2005-2009, Consumer Security
Please do not PM or Email me for personal support. Post in the Forums instead and we will all learn. Smile
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies.    Spyware Warrior Forum Index -> Anti-Spyware and Security Software Discussion All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



smartBlue Style © 2002 Smartor
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2002 phpBB Group